Kenya: Fresh Battle for Kenyatta in Repeat Election Petition
15 November 2017
The East African (Nairobi)Kenya: Fresh Battle for Kenyatta in Repeat Election Petition
A battle of wits between top lawyers marked the opening of the hearing of the petition against election of Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta in the October 26 repeat poll.
As we went to press, the Supreme Court was Tuesday evening expected to rule on preliminary applications by lawyers seeking to have some documents expunged from court records, and also objecting to opposition coalition Nasa's admission in the case.
President Uhuru Kenyatta and the electoral c ommission opposed an application by petitioners for scrutiny of materials used in the October 26 repeat presidential poll.
The two argued that the application by Njonjo Mue and Khelef Khalifa is prejudicial to them, a waste of judicial time and an abuse of court process.
Through lawyer Mahat Somane, the commission said the documents the petitioners were seeking have been provided in the filings presented to the court and parties to the petition in soft copy format.
Mr Mue and Mr Khalifa wanted the apex court to order IEBC to produce copies of internal memos, minutes, plenary deliberations among other documents relating to the repeat poll for the period between September 1 and October 31.
Manipulation and discrepancies
Julie Soweto, lawyer for the petitioners, told the court there is evidence of manipulation and discrepancies in the documents, and that it is only through scrutiny that the petitioners could know what reall y happened on October 26.
"Issues raised in the memo by Dr Roselyn Akombe after she resigned is vital in the interest of justice that the parties should be allowed to access the deliberations of the IEBC and particularly on issues that were publicly admitted by the commission," Ms Soweto argued.
She said IEBC chairman Wafula Chebukati had publicly admitted the issues raised by Dr Akombe before she fled and such admission had opened up the commission to public scrutiny and debate and thus the public deserves to know the complete picture of what was happening in the commission.
She thus asked the court to compel IEBC to present for scrutiny SD cards of the Kenya Integrated Elections Management System (Kiems), the voter register and number of voters who turned up to vote because there are allegations of vote tempering.
"Evidence shows discrepancy and manipulation of results transmission and the only way to verify is thro ugh scrutiny," she said.
However, lawyer Waweru Gatonye for IEBC opposed the application, arguing it was made in very general and broad terms.
"This can only be characterised as a fishing expedition and an afterthought should not be allowed. There is a deliberate failure of the petitioner to comply with section 27 of the IEBC Act, which allows a party to seek information from IEBC," he said.
"No explanation has been given, if at all it was required, has not been applied for. This is an afterthought. It is made for a collateral purpose to show that the Commission cannot comply with an order made by the court to its advantage." He said there was lack of good faith in making the application.
"The forms have been filed and there are certified copies. Why should the original be brought to court? Have they looked at them and doubted the forms?"
Reported by Sam Kiplagat and Ibrahim Oruko.
Business D ailyKenyatta Knocks Nasa Out of Presidential Petition
President Uhuru Kenyatta on Tuesday succeeded in his bid to have the National Super Alliance prohibited from taking aâ¦ Read more Â»
Supreme Court Commences Hearing of Petitions Seeking Invalidation of Kenyatta's Win
Kenyatta Knocks Nasa Out of Presidential Petition
Copyright Â© 2017 The East African. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections â" or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica publishes around 900 reports a day from more than 140 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.Source: Google News